Participants.
Four hundred and you can eighty-three users was employed of a large university from inside the Hong-kong by way of ads printed from inside the university and you may halls, size emails due to departments and you can traits, and you can snowballing. Assessment taken place within the a laboratory. Members accomplished the brand new intercourse salience scale, new mixed-gender stress measure and you can reported the market record. All tips had been displayed within brand spanking new English words because English is the medium of knowledge to have tertiary knowledge into the Hong-kong. This research is actually carried out in accordance to your information and you can recognition of University away from Hong-kong Peoples Browse Ethics Committee (HKU HREC). All sufferers offered composed told concur in accordance with the Report out of Helsinki. Parental consent was not necessary for new HKU HREC because of it decide to try.
School banding was averaged if participants had attended more than one high school (only 4.1% of the total sample). Participants also reported their college year, total parental income and parental education, numbers of sisters and brothers, faculty, and sexual orientation. Students’ faculty was coded as male-dominated, female-dominated, or gender-balanced based on enrolment statistics . Sexual orientation was assessed using the sexfinder profile adapted Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) . Participants rated their sexual orientation in the past 12 months on four aspects, namely attraction, behavior, fantasy, and identity, from 0 (other-sex only) to 6 (same-sex only). The number of participants was roughly balanced by school type and student gender. Participants who had switched between single-sex and coeducational schools were excluded from analysis (n = 27). The final sample consisted of 456 graduates (239 females; 52.4%) who had attended 182 different high schools. These graduates either attended single-sex schools (n = 207) or coeducational schools (n = 249) for high school education. This sample size had over 80% a priori power to detect small differences (.26 < d < .30) at ? = .05, two-tailed . The sample was almost exclusively Chinese (97.6%) and aged years on average. The mean parental income of the sample (HKD42632) suggested that the sample was demographically similar to undergraduate students from several local universities (e.g., [58–60]).
Table 6 presents detailed participant characteristics by school type and student gender. Consistent with prior research [3,4,8], participants from single-sex schools had parents with higher education level, t(454) = 3.48, p = .001, and attended more academically excellent schools, t(387) = 4.26, p < .001, unequal variances, than did participants from coeducational schools.
Sex salience measure.
Gender salience are mentioned by the same approach utilized in Research step 1. The new inter-rater accuracy was good for all solutions (? anywhere between .87 to .99).
Part of most other-sex close friends level.
Percentage of most other-sex best friends was counted because of the same means found in Analysis step one. Part of most other-gender relatives wasn’t examined regarding the college decide to try.
Mixed-sex anxiety scale.
Such as Data step 1, participants said its combined-sex stress with the modified matchmaking nervousness scale (DAS-A) . Compared with Research 1, users within the Analysis dos completed a full 21-goods types of DAS-A where relationship experience try well-known about school sample (93.4% of your people claimed a world relationships sense; get a hold of a number of relationship experience circumstances regarding the Relationships Background Survey inside Desk D inside S1 Document). People who got never ever dated in advance of was asked to assume exactly how they would become and you will respond in the described circumstances. Because of it full scale, 10 things counted Anxiety about Negative Review, eight items counted Personal Stress during the Relationship Issues, five issues measured Public Stress in the Mixed-intercourse Teams, and you will four filler circumstances considering a break from score nervousness-associated items. The internal feel is actually ideal for complete DAS-A good (? = .95), Concern about Negative Testing (? = .92), Social Distress when you look at the Relationship (? = .89), and Societal Stress for the Combined-intercourse Teams (? = .80). As our very own attention wasn’t simply towards matchmaking stress and simply 2.6% of school users said that have zero heterosexual interest at all, we provided all professionals on analysis off blended-gender nervousness and you will controlled having sexual direction.